SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Deepak Yadav & Ors. vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 25 March, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

$~27
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: March 25, 2021

+ CRL.M.C. 1012/2021 Crl.M.A. 5144/2021

DEEPAK YADAV ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Nairit Bansal
Mr. Uday Chauhan,
Advocates

Versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI ANR. ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Izhar Ahmed, Additional
Public Prosecutor for
respondent No.1State with SI
Kalam Singh
Respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

%

1. Vide present petition, quashing of FIR No.567/2019, under

Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Sagarpur,

Delhi and all other proceedings arising there-from is sought by

petitioners

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for

Crl.M.C. 1012/2021 Page 1 of 3
State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in

the Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in

question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also

present in the Court.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken

up for final hearing and disposal.

5. The marriage of petitioner- husband and respondent No.2-

wife was solemnized on 10.06.2017 and due to temporal

differences, they started living separately since 16.11.2018. The

dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in question.

6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the

parties have amicably settled their dispute and they are happily and

peacefully living together for last one year.

7. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that she has

no grievance against the petitioners and to enable her to restore

cordial relations with her husband and in-laws, proceedings arising

out of FIR in question be brought to an end.

8. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been

amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in

Crl.M.C. 1012/2021 Page 2 of 3
question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with

the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.

9. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.567/2019, under Sections

498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Sagarpur, Delhi and

consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

10. The petition and pending application are accordingly allowed

and disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
MARCH 25, 2021
r

Crl.M.C. 1012/2021 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation