SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Deo Nath Yadav @ Debo Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 23 July, 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2019 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani

1. DEO NATH YADAV @ DEBO YADAV Son of Late Sundar Yadav Resident
of Village – Bhatchaura, P.S.- Babubarhi, Dist.- Madhubani.
2. Kiran Devi W/o Krishan Kumar Yadav @ Kishan Yadav Resident of Village
– Bhatchaura, P.S.- Babubarhi, Dist.- Madhubani.
3. Eklash Devi W/o Deonath Yadav @ Debo Yadav Resident of Village –
Bhatchaura, P.S.- Babubarhi, Dist.- Madhubani.

… … Petitioner/s
The State of Bihar

… … Opposite Party/s

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh


2 23-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged
under Sections 341, Section323, Section324, Section324,Section307,Section354,Section504/Section34 IPC registered in
connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 08 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated
in the backdrop of land dispute. It is submitted that the specific
accusation of assault with knife is on co-accused Krishna Kumar Yadav
@ Kisan Yadav whereas, the accusation against the petitioners is of
assault with fists and slaps which is general and omnibus in nature. It
is submitted that the said co-accused Krishna Kumar Yadav @ Kisan
Yadav had arrived subsequently with knife and assaulted the
informant’s husband on his stomach and chest, multiple times. It is
therefore, submitted that the ingredients of the offence under Section
307 IPC are not made against the petitioners who are not armed. There
is no accusation in the FIR to attract the provisions of Section 354 IPC.
The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45453 of 2019(2) dt.23-07-2019

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or
surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of
communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)
each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned ACJM III, Madhubani, in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case
No. 08 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
438 (2) SectionCr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till
conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not
already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so
required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for
cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner no.1 shall remain physically present and petitioner
nos. 2 and 3 shall be well represented in Court on each and every date
during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates
without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be
cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J)



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation