SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dhananjoy Das vs Unknown on 10 April, 2019

1

71 10.4.2019

C.R.M. 3552 of 2019
In Re: – An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 20/3/2019 in connection with Onda
P.S. Case No.114 of 2018 dated 07/10/2018 under Sections
498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the
Dowry Prohibition Act.

gd And
In the matter of: Dhananjoy Das.
….petitioner.

Mr. Suman Chakraborty
…for the petitioner.

Md. Anwar Hossain
Ms. Benajir Hasna
…for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Onda P.S. Case No.114 of

2018 dated 07/10/2018 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal

Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner says that others on the same footing have been granted

bail by this court.

The State opposes the prayer on the ground that the victim died

within five months of her marriage and there is credible evidence that the

victim was tortured at her matrimonial home and insulted for not being able

to bring more dowry.

There are statements attributed to neighbours which reveal that the

victim may have been ill-treated at the matrimonial home. However, there is

no eyewitness or direct evidence relating to the incident that culminated in the

unnatural death of the victim. The victim died of burn injuries. There is no

material to show whether anyone poured anything inflammable on the victim

or anyone lit the fire.

There is no doubt that an adverse inference has to be drawn against

the petitioner and the petitioner has to rebut the same. But the material

against the petitioner as evident from the case diary does not warrant his

continued detention, particularly since there may not be any evidence to

tamper with or any witness to intimidate. If the petitioner is convicted upon

the trial being concluded, he will be required to serve out the sentence at that

point of time.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a

bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like

amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bankura on the

conditions that he shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with the
2

evidence in any manner whatsoever and he shall appear before the trial court

on every date of hearing.

In the event of violation of any of the conditions, the trial court will be

at liberty to cancel the bail without reference to this Court.

The prayer for bail is allowed, subject to the conditions stated above.

Certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the

parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Sanjib Banerjee, J.)

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation