SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dilip Kalu Dagade vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 June, 2019

1/321-ABA-378-19.odt

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY
CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORYBAILAPPLICATIONNO.378OF2019

DilipKaluDagade….Applicant

versus

TheStateofMaharashtra….Respondent
…….

•Mr.RiteshThobde,AdvocateforApplicant.
•Mr.RajanSalvi,APPfortheState/Respondents.
•Mr.PrakashRatanUmap,PSI,PandharpurRuralPolice
Station,present.

CORAM:SARANGV.KOTWAL,J.
DATE:10thJUNE,2019

P.C.:

1.TheApplicantisseekinganticipatorybailinconnection

withC.R.No.I17of2019registeredwithPandharpurRuralPolice

Station,undersections498Aand304Br/w.34SectionoftheIndian

PenalCode.

2.TheF.I.R.islodgedbyoneMohanDukalewhois

fatherofdeceasedPriyanka.HementionedintheF.I.R.thathis

daughterPriyankahadgotmarriedwithoneAnilDagdeabout

V.B.GOKHALE

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:35:::
2/321-ABA-378-19.odt

fouryearsback.Thecouplehastwoyearoldson.On15/09/2019

Priyankaconsumedpoisonandcommittedsuicide.Thefirst

informantmadeallegationsthatPriyanka’shusband,motherin

law,presentapplicant,husband’ssisterSunita,Sunita’shusband

Bharatusedtoharassherondemandofmoneyandbecauseof

theirconstantharassmentshegotfedupandcommittedsuicide.

Thepresentapplicantisbrotherinlawofthedeceased.

3.Learnedcounselfortheapplicantpointedoutthat

SunitaandBharatarealreadygrantedanticipatorybail.The

husbandandmotherinlawofthedeceasedwerearrestedand

weregrantedregularbail.

4.Insofarasallegationsagainstthepresentapplicant

areconcerned,therearecommonallegationsagainstallthe

accusedincludingSunitaandBharatwhoaregrantedanticipatory

bail.Thoughpresentapplicantwasresidingallegedlyinthesame

house,learnedcounselfortheapplicantsubmitsthathewas

employedwithM.S.R.T.C.andpostedatSangola.Inanycase,the

allegationsagainstalltheaccusedarecommonandinparticular,

allegationsagainstSunitaandherhusbandandagainstthepresent

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:35:::
3/321-ABA-378-19.odt

applicantarethesame.Therefore,onparity,theapplicant

deservestobegrantedthesamerelief.Itwaspointedoutby

learnedA.P.P.thatPriyankawasharassedbecausefamilywanted

moneyforweddingofthepresentapplicant.However,inthis

connectiontherearenoallegationsthatapplicanthimselfhas

demandedanymoneydirectlyorindirectlyfromPriyankaonthat

count.Inthisviewofthematter,theapplicanthasmadeoutacase

forgrantofanticipatorybail.Custodialinterrogationofthe

applicantisnotnecessary.

5.Hence,thefollowingorder:

ORDER

(i)IntheeventofhisarrestinconnectionwithC.R.

No.I17of2019registeredwithPandharpur
RuralPoliceStation,Dist.Solapur,theapplicant
isdirectedtobereleasedonbailonhis
furnishingPRbondinthesumofRs.25,000/-
(RupeesTwentyFiveThousandOnly)withone
ortwosuretiesinthelikeamount.

(ii)Applicationstandsdisposedofaccordingly.

(SARANGV.KOTWAL,J.)

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:35:::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation