SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dinesh Bansal vs Sonia Bansal on 12 July, 2018

236 FAO-1611-2016 with CMM-91-2018

DINESH BANSAL
V/S
SONIA BANSAL

Present: Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the respondent.

*****

Reply to application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage

Act has been filed in the Court today. Copy given.

Aggrieved by the dismissal of his petition for divorce, the

appellant-husband has preferred appeal before this Court.

During pendency of the appeal, the respondent-wife has filed

an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act claiming

maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs.30,000/- per month besides

claiming litigation expenses of Rs.22,000/- alleging that the appellant-

husband is having a readymade garments shop and is earning a sum of

Rs.50,000/- per month besides having moveable and immoveable properties,

residential house and commercial shop. His total income from all the

resources is alleged to be Rs.80,000/- per month.

The application has been contested inter alia on the ground that

the respondent-wife is already getting maintenance allowance of Rs.3800/-

per month in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. It has been brought to

the notice of the Court that the appellant-husband is maintaining two

children born out of the wedlock after arranging the funds from here and

there. He claims that he is a Salesman in a garments shop. The appellant-

husband, present in the Court, informs that he is only earning a sum of

Rs.9000/- per month. Unfortunately, the allegation of mental illness has

1 of 3
22-07-2018 19:56:39 :::
FAO-1611-2016 with CMM-91-2018 -2-

been levelled against the respondent-wife. One of the children born out of

the wedlock, in custody of the appellant-husband, is suffering from epilepsy

and requires constant medical care and attention.

We have considered the facts and circumstances of the case. In

peculiar circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the appellant-

husband cannot run away from his liability to maintain his wife during

pendency of the matrimonial litigation. No doubt, he is burdened with the

responsibility of looking after two minor children but at the same time, he

cann ignore the responsibility of maintaining his wife especially when she

has got no source of income.

The respondent-wife claims that the appellant-husband is

earning a sum of Rs.80,000/- per month whereas the appellant-husband has

come forward with the fact that his income is only Rs.9000/- per month as a

Salesman on the garments shop.

In view of the large difference between the claim of both the

parties regarding the income of appellant-husband, we are of the opinion

that a bit of estimation would be required for the purpose of determining the

amount of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses to be paid by

the respondent-wife.

The appellant-husband is an able bodied person having long

experience of running garments shop. As per the respondent-wife, he is

running his own shop by working in the shop of his father whereas he

claims to be just an employee earning only Rs.9000/- per month.

Considering him to be equivalent to a skilled labourer, monthly income of

the appellant-husband is assessed to be not less than Rs.20,000/-. In view of

the fact that he is maintaining two children born out of the wedlock, a sum

2 of 3
22-07-2018 19:56:40 :::
FAO-1611-2016 with CMM-91-2018 -3-

of Rs.5000/- will be sufficient enough for the respondent-wife towards the

maintenance pendente lite. The said amount will be payable with effect from

the date of application i.e. April, 2018. It is made clear that a sum of

Rs.3800/- per month would be required to be adjusted against the amount of

Rs.5000/-, in case it is being paid pursuant to the order passed by the

Magistrate in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Litigation expenses

are assessed as Rs.22,000/-. A sum of Rs.20,000/- earlier paid will be

deductible from the amount of Rs.22,000/-.

Application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is

allowed in above manner.

For payment of entire arrears of maintenance pendente lite and

balance of litigation expenses, adjourned to 17.10.2018.

(M.M.S. BEDI)
JUDGE

July 12, 2018 (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
harsha JUDGE

3 of 3
22-07-2018 19:56:40 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation