SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dinesh Chand Singh & Ors. vs State Of U.P. & Anr. on 29 August, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. – 11

Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. – 5006 of 2019

Applicant :- Dinesh Chand Singh Ors.

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Anr.

Counsel for Applicant :- Yogendra Mishra,Dinesh Kumar Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Rajeev Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the impugned charge sheet No. 01 of 2018 dated 12.09.2018 submitted in Case Crime No. 821 of 2017 under Sections 498A, Section506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act, with the summoning order passed by the court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Custom), Lucknow, P.S. Ghazipur, District Lucknow.

After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to surrender and move bail application, before the court concerned and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law.

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

In view of above, it is provided that if the applicants surrender before the court below within thirty days from today, and apply for bail, their application for bail shall be considered and decided by the courts below in view of the settled law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Amrawati Another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290, as affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).

It is made clear that this order shall not be treated as an implied direction of this Court to grant bail to the applicants and the court concerned shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance to law.

Till the aforesaid period of thirty days, no coercive measures shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

In case, applicants fail to surrender before the Courts below, within the stipulated period of thirty days, they will not get benefit of this order.

With above directions this application stands disposed of.

Order Date :- 29.8.2019

S. Shivhare

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation