1

118 22.02.2019 C.R.M. 2195 of 2019
Aloke Court 28 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 20.02.2019 in connection with Coke
Oven P.S. Case No.101 dated 29.06.2018 under Sections
498A/306/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

And
In the matter of: Dinesh Ram Anr.

…Petitioners
Mr. Amajit De
… for the petitioners
Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. A.P.P.

Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya
… for the State

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are the in-

laws of the victim-housewife and the incident occurred 12 years after

marriage.

Allowed Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record and keeping in

mind the nature of allegations in the light of the aforesaid submissions

made on behalf of the petitioners and in view of the complicity of the

petitioners in the alleged crime, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail

to them.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners

shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees

Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions

as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 and he shall appear before the court below and pray for regular bail

within a fortnight from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, allowed.

Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary legal

formalities.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2