SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dinesh vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 30 January, 2018


Criminal Misc. No. M-7526 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : January 30, 2018
Dinesh …..Petitioner

State of Haryana and another ….Respondents

Criminal Misc. No. M-6287 of 2017 (OM)
Tarawati …..Petitioner

State of Haryana and another ….Respondents


Present: Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Seena Mand, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Rajender Singh Malik, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

This order shall decide Criminal Misc. Nos. M- 7526 and

6287 of 2017.

Prayer in these petitions is for grant of anticipatory bail to

the petitioners in FIR No. 17 dated 30.01.2017 under Section 498A,

506, 377 IPC registered at Police Station Women Jhajjar, District


It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely

implicated in this case. In fact, the complainant is living in the

matrimonial home. Her father-in-law i.e. Satpal son of Om Parkash as

well as her grand father-in-law, Om Parkash are residing in the

matrimonial home. Children of respondent No. 2 – complainant and

the petitioner – Dinesh are residing in the said house. It is in fact the

1 of 2
04-02-2018 16:19:03 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M-7526 of 2017 (OM) -2-

present petitioners, who have been ousted from the house. Petitioner –

Dinesh is the husband and Tarawati the mother-in-law of the

complainant – respondent No. 2. Moreover, both the petitioners have

joined investigation. It is, thus, prayed that these petitions be allowed.

Learned counsel for the complainant is unable to deny that

the complainant is living in the matrimonial home alongwith her

children, father-in-law and grand father-in-law.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC

Munesh, verifies that the petitioners have joined investigation. They are

not involved in any other criminal case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade

the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above

but without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is

considered just and expedient to allow these petitions. Consequently,

order dated 23.02.2017 passed in CRM-M-6287-2017 is made absolute

and in the event of arrest of the petitioner – Dinesh (in CRM-M-7526

of 2017), he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Investigating

Officer/Arresting officer. He shall appear before the Investigating

agency as and when required. Petitioner shall comply with the

conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Lisa Gill)
January 30, 2018 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
04-02-2018 16:19:05 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation