HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. – 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 40088 of 2019
Applicant :- Dippu
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shri Prakash Dwivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Chandra Shekhar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Dippu, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.402 of 2016, under Section 377 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Adalhat, District- Mirzapur, during pendency of trial.
Submission is that it is a case of false implication. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case with some ulterior motive. The medical report does not supports the prosecution case. The applicant was granted interim bail from the court below from the year 2016 to 5.9.2019. He remained in jail for six months before grant on interim bail. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is languishing in jail since 19.8.2019. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, larger mandate of the SectionArticle 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019