SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dowry Prohibition Act vs In The Matter Of: Suman Mukherjee on 29 January, 2018


61 29.01.2018
ad  Ct. No.28 C.R.M. 389 of 2018
am (Allowed)

In  Re:  ‐  An  application  for  bail  under  Section  439  of  the  Code  of
Criminal  Procedure  filed  on  10.01.2018  in  connection  with  Barasat  P.S.
Case  No.  484  of  2017  dated  25.05.2017  under  sections
498A/304B/325/302/34  of  the  Indian  Penal  Code  and  Section  3/4  of  the
Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of: Suman Mukherjee
                                            … … petitioner.

Mr. Sandip Chakraborty
  … … for the petitioner.

Mr. P.P. Das
Ms. Anita Gaur
… … for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for about 250

days and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail

and submits that the case has been committed before the learned Court of Sessions.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and bearing in

mind  the  nature  of  allegations  and  the  period  of  detention  suffered  by

the petitioner, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly,  the  petitioner  shall  be  released  on  bail  upon

furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/‐ with two sureties of like amount, one

of whom must be local, to the satisfaction  of  the learned Chief Judicial

Magistrate, North 24 Parganas at Barasat subject to the condition that he

shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not

intimidate  witnesses  nor  tamper  with  evidence  in  any  manner


In the event she fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause,

the  trial  court  shall  be  at  liberty  to  cancel  his  bail  in  accordance  with  law  without

further reference to this court.

The application for bail is, thus, allowed.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)                                 (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation