SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dr. Amaltass vs The State Of Kerala on 21 November, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

WEDNESDAY,THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1940

Crl.MC.No. 6057 of 2018

CC 900/2016 of J.M.F.C (TEMPORARY SPECIAL COURT),KOLLAM

CRIME NO. 123/2016 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4:

1 DR. AMALTASS
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O T.A.SISSIL
RESIDING AT T.C 37/3778
JRA-804
THIRUMALA P.O
THIRUVANATHAPURAM-695006
NOW WORKING AS CONSULTANT
HOMEOPATHY PHYSICIAN AT
DR.BATRAS HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LTD
CHENNAI-600001

2 SMT.LATEEFA,
AGED 60 YEARS
W/O.T.A.SISSIL, RESIDING AT
T.C.37/3778 JRA-804, THIRUMALA.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.

3 AMITHA SISSIL,
AGED 31 YEARS
D/O.LATHEEFA, T.C.37/3778 JRA-804,
THIRUMALA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.

4 MR.T.A SISSIL,
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O.ABDUL SAMADH, RESIDING AT
T.C.37/3778 JRA-804, THIRUMALA.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.

BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM)
Crl.MC.No. 6057 of 2018 2

RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT
ERNAKULAM-682031
THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM DISTRICT

2 SMT.SALMA SULTHANA,
AGED 24 YEARS, D/O.SULFIKKAR,
RESIDING AT MANNATHU VEEDU, THOPPIL NAGAR-86 A,
MEDAYIL JUNCTION, KAVANADU.P.O.,
KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691 003.

PP. SRI. C.K. PRASAD.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
21.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 6057 of 2018 3

ORDER

When the matter was taken up, the learned Public Prosecutor

on instructions submits that further investigation was ordered and the

same was conducted. It is submitted that the accused Nos.2 to 4 in

Crime No.123 of 2016 of the Kollam West Police Station have been

deleted from the array of the accused. Now the only person arrayed

as an accused in the crime is the 1 st petitioner herein and the offence

alleged is under Section 498A of the IPC.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays that

he be permitted to withdraw this petition without prejudice to his right

to challenge the final report.

Reserving such right, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

SD/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

JUDGE
IAP

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation