IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
WEDNESDAY,THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 6057 of 2018
CC 900/2016 of J.M.F.C (TEMPORARY SPECIAL COURT),KOLLAM
CRIME NO. 123/2016 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4:
1 DR. AMALTASS
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O T.A.SISSIL
RESIDING AT T.C 37/3778
JRA-804
THIRUMALA P.O
THIRUVANATHAPURAM-695006
NOW WORKING AS CONSULTANT
HOMEOPATHY PHYSICIAN AT
DR.BATRAS HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LTD
CHENNAI-600001
2 SMT.LATEEFA,
AGED 60 YEARS
W/O.T.A.SISSIL, RESIDING AT
T.C.37/3778 JRA-804, THIRUMALA.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.
3 AMITHA SISSIL,
AGED 31 YEARS
D/O.LATHEEFA, T.C.37/3778 JRA-804,
THIRUMALA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.
4 MR.T.A SISSIL,
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O.ABDUL SAMADH, RESIDING AT
T.C.37/3778 JRA-804, THIRUMALA.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM)
Crl.MC.No. 6057 of 2018 2
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT
ERNAKULAM-682031
THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM DISTRICT
2 SMT.SALMA SULTHANA,
AGED 24 YEARS, D/O.SULFIKKAR,
RESIDING AT MANNATHU VEEDU, THOPPIL NAGAR-86 A,
MEDAYIL JUNCTION, KAVANADU.P.O.,
KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691 003.
PP. SRI. C.K. PRASAD.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
21.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 6057 of 2018 3
ORDER
When the matter was taken up, the learned Public Prosecutor
on instructions submits that further investigation was ordered and the
same was conducted. It is submitted that the accused Nos.2 to 4 in
Crime No.123 of 2016 of the Kollam West Police Station have been
deleted from the array of the accused. Now the only person arrayed
as an accused in the crime is the 1 st petitioner herein and the offence
alleged is under Section 498A of the IPC.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays that
he be permitted to withdraw this petition without prejudice to his right
to challenge the final report.
Reserving such right, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE
IAP
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
