SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dr. Rahmat Ali @ Rahmat Ali vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 28 March, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48924 of 2014
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-552 Year-2014 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE District-
Siwan

Dr. Rahmat Ali son of Rustam Ali Resident of Village – Dumaria, Police
Station – Uchakagaon, District – Gopalganj.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Dr. Sehla Rahman D/o Hifzur Rahman R/o Mohalla – Sheikh Mohalla,
(Azad Nagar), P.S. – Town, Dist – Siwan.

… … Opposite Party/s

with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6865 of 2015
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2014 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj

Dr. Rahmat Ali @ Rahmat Ali Son of Rustam Ali, Resident of Village –
Dufmaria, P.S. – Uchkagaon, District – Gopalganj and presently posted as a
Doctor in Madan Mohan Malviya Hospital, New Delhi.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Dr. Sehla Rahman, D/o Hifzur Rahman, Resident of Shekh Mohalla, (Azad
Nagar), Town Police Station, District – Siwan.

… … Opposite Party/s

with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57918 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2014 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj

Dr. Rahmat Ali S/o Rustam Ali, resident of Village- Dumaria, P.S. –
Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj, presently posted as Medical Officer, Madan
Mohan Malviya Hospital, P.S.- Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Dr. Sehla Rahman, D/o Hafzur Rahman, resident of Shekh Mohalla, (Azad
Nagar), Town Police Station- Siwan, District- Siwan.

… … Opposite Party/s

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48924 of 2014 dt.28-03-2019
2/4 criminal

Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 48924 of 2014)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6865 of 2015)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57918 of 2017)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 28-03-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned A.P.P.

for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner and opposite party no. 2 are same in all

the cases. However, two cases pertain to F.I.R. and a complaint

case and the third relates to an order by the lower Court by which

the provisional bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled in the

police case.

3. The opposite party no. 2 has filed Complaint Case No.

552 of 2014 (T.R. No. 4576 of 2014) in which cognizance has

been taken against the petitioner on 17.05.2014 under Sections

498A, 406 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The opposite party

no. 2 has also filed Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 110 of 2014 (G.R.

No. 1553 of 2014/T. R. No. 3181 of 2017) in which cognizance

has been taken on 09.11.2015 under Sections 323, 406 and 498A

of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48924 of 2014 dt.28-03-2019
3/4 criminal

4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties

drew the attention of the Court to the order recorded on 11.03.2019

which discloses that one time final settlement was reached

between the parties under which the petitioner had agreed to pay

Rs. 12 Lakhs to the opposite party no. 2, out of which Rs. 10

Lakhs had already been paid. With regard to remaining two Lakhs,

learned counsel for the petitioner has produced demand draft in the

name of Shaila Rahman Siddiqui for Rs. 2 Lakhs dated 20.03.2019

bearing no. 023401 drawn on Axis Bank, Okhala Phase-1, New

Delhi. The same has been handed over to learned counsel for the

opposite party no. 2 in Court. Learned counsel for the opposite

party no. 2, who while accepting the draft submitted that as per the

compromise the petitioner having discharged his onus, she had no

objection to both the cases being quashed.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State does not oppose.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the fact

that the petitioner and opposite party no. 2 are husband and wife

and now they have compromised and settled the dispute among

themselves, the Court finds that for securing the ends of justice,

the criminal cases are required to be closed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48924 of 2014 dt.28-03-2019
4/4 criminal

7. Accordingly, the applications are allowed. The entire

criminal proceeding, including all orders passed, arising out of

Complaint Case No. 552 of 2014 (T.R. No. 4576 of 2014) pending

before the Court below at Siwan and Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 110

of 2014 (G.R. No. 1553 of 2014/Tr. No. 3181 of 2017) pending

before the Court below at Gopalganj, stand quashed.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

s.hassan/-

AFR/NAFR NAFR
U
T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh