SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Dr. Sidharth Nayak & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 7 November, 2019

$~45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 07.11.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 5694/2019
DR. SIDHARTH NAYAK ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Ms. Indu, Adv. with petitioners in
person
versus
STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State
SI Leela Ram, PS Uttam Nagar
Mr. Mani Kaul, Adv. For R-2 with R-
2 in person

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 39866/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.5694/2019
Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR

No.1169/2018 dated 13.12.2018 registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar

instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the

IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

CRL.M.C.5694/2019 Page 1 of 3

3. Notice issued.

4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 06.02.2013

as per Hindu rites and rituals and no child was born out of the wedlock. Due

to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2,

they started living separately since 27.05.2018.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their

well wishers and relatives have settled all their disputes amicably.

7. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Leela Ram of Police Station Uttam Nagar and submits that

matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any

further. She admits having received the settled amount of ₹2 lacs by way of

a demand draft No.633279, dated 12.09.2019 drawn on Indian Bank,

towards full and final settlement of all her claims from the petitioners.

8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

CRL.M.C.5694/2019 Page 2 of 3

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 1169/2018 dated

13.12.2018 registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 IPC and consequent

proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed accordingly.

11. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 07, 2019
sm

CRL.M.C.5694/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation