SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gautam S/O Omprakash Sharma And … vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 19 November, 2018

(Operative Order) (1) Cri. Appln. No. 01142 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Application No. 01142 of 2017

District : Hingoli

1. Gautam s/o. Omprakash Sharma,
Age : 38 years,
Occupation : Privat5e Job.

2. Sita w/o. Omprakash Sharma,
Age : 60 years,
Occupation : Household.

3. Omprakash Mangilalji Sharma,
Age : 64 years,
Occupation : Pensioner.

4. Gaurav s/o. Omprakash Sharma, .. Applicants
Age : 34 years, (Original
Occupation : Business. accused)

5. Ujwala d/o. Omprakash Sharma,
Age : 32 years,
Occupation : Household,

Petitioners no.01 to 05
R/o. Radharaman Colony,
Manawar, Taluka Manawar,
Dist. Dhar (M.P.).

6. Rani @ Komal w/o. Vijay Sharma,
Age : 36 years,
Occupation : Household,
R/o. Meera Road, Mumbai.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through Hingoli Police Station.

2. Shikha w/o. Gautam Sharma, .. Respondents
Age : 49 years, (No.02 –
Occupation : Agriculture, Original
R/o. Shivaji Nagar, Hingoli, complainant)
Taluka Dist. Hingoli.

::: Uploaded on – 24/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on – 25/11/2018 00:12:58 :::
(Operative Order) (2) Cri. Appln. No. 01142 of 2017

………..

Mr. Shailesh S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate, for the
applicants.

Mr. R.V. Dasalkar, Additional Public Prosecutor,
for respondent no.01.

………..

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI,JJ.

DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER 2018

OPERATIVE ORDER :

01. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
By consent, heard finally.

02. For the reasons recorded separately,
following order is passed :-

(a) The application is partly allowed.

(b) The application to the extent of applicants
no.01 to 05 is disposed of as withdrawn.

(c) The application to the extent of applicant
no.06, namely, Rani @ Komal w/o. Vijay Sharma is
allowed. Relief is granted to her, in terms of
prayer clause “B”. So also, proceedings in
Regular Criminal Case No. 07 of 2017, pending

::: Uploaded on – 24/11/2018 25/11/2018 00:12:58 :::
(Operative Order) (3) Cri. Appln. No. 01142 of 2017

before Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Hingoli, for
offences punishable under Section 323, 498A, 504,
506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal
Code, to the extent of above named applicant
no.06, are quashed and set aside.

(d) Rule made absolute in the above terms.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( T.V. Nalawade )
JUDGE JUDGE

………..

puranik / OOCRIAPPLN1142.17

::: Uploaded on – 24/11/2018 25/11/2018 00:12:58 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation