SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gora Singh vs State Of Punjab on 13 September, 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 17658 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : September 13, 2017

Gora Singh …..Petitioner


State of Punjab ….Respondent


Present: Mr. Kamaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Devinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.


The petitioner, who is the father-in-law of the complainant,

prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0018 dated 19.04.2017 under

Sections 498A, 406 IPC registered at Police Station Women, District


It is contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in

this case only due to his relationship with the complainant. The complainant

named as many as eleven (11) persons in the FIR. On investigation, nine (9)

persons were found innocent and only two (2) have been proceeded against.

The petitioner’s son has been released on bail pending trial. The allegations

in the FIR are patently incorrect and false. Moreover, the petitioner has

joined investigation pursuant to interim order dated 18.05.2017 passed by

this Court. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

Learned counsel for the State verifies that the petitioner has

since joined investigation. It is, however, submitted that one gold ring has

yet to be recovered from him. However, learned counsel for the

1 of 2
18-09-2017 01:16:49 :::
Criminal Misc. No.M- 17658 of 2017 (OM) -2-

petitioner relies on a decision of this Court in Prit Pal Singh versus State

of Punjab and another 2014 (5) RCR (Criminal) 771 to urge that the

concession of anticipatory bail should not be denied merely on the ground

of certain recoveries to be effected.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 18.05.2017

is made absolute.

(Lisa Gill)
September 13, 2017 Judge

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
18-09-2017 01:16:50 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation