SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gurbachan Singh vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 15 May, 2018

CRM No.M-34848 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 34848 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: May 15 , 2018.

Gurbachan Singh …… PETITIONER (s)


Union Territory, Chandigarh and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. A.K.Lamdharia, APP, U.T.

Mr. Narinder Singh Pawar, Advocate
for the complainant/respondent No.2.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.90 dated 04.10.2016 under Sections 406/498A IPC,

registered at Police Station Women, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

Notice of motion was issued in this case limited to the extent of

exploring an amicable resolution of the dispute between the parties. It was

noticed by this Court on 17.01.2018 that the petitioner and respondent No.2

were amenable to part ways. The petitioner’s father on behalf of the petitioner

1 of 2
20-05-2018 11:33:51 :::
CRM No.M-34848 of 2017

offered a sum of `20,00,000/- in lieu of all claims of respondent No.2 and

sought visitation rights qua both the minor children to the petitioner as well as

the grand-parents. Respondent No.2 had expressed reservations in respect to

visitation rights to the grand-parents and proposed a sum of `30,00,000/-. The

matter was adjourned.

The petitioner as well as respondent No.2, duly identified by their

counsel, are present in Court today.

The petitioner, at this stage, states that he is not ready and willing to

part with any amount over and above `20,00,000/- and he is not ready to settle

the matter unless and until, he is granted custody of both the minor children. He

is not even ready to settle for visitation rights for which respondent No.2 is

agreeable as on date.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw

this petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

May 15 , 2018. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
20-05-2018 11:33:52 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation