SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gurinder Kaur vs Mandeep Singh on 15 May, 2018

215.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

FAO-5341-2016 (OM)
Date of decision:15.05.2018.

Gurinder Kaur … Appellant

Versus

Mandeep Singh …. Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
—-

Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate,
for the appellant.

Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate,
for the respondent.

—-

M.M.S. BEDI, J.(Oral)

Aggrieved by the dismissal of her application under Section 25

of Guardians and Wards Act for the custody of minor children Bibekdeep

Singh (son) and Arpandeep Kaur (daughter), the wife has preferred this

appeal.

Bibekdeep Singh has by this time attained majority whereas

Arpandeep Kaur is still minor.

Counsel for the appellant has submitted that he has got the

instructions to state that the appellant will be satisfied in case she is granted

the visitation right in respect of Arpandeep Kaur daughter.

This appeal is disposed of with the consent of both the parties.

It has been agreed between the parties that the appellant will be permitted to

meet the minor child-Arpandeep Kaur at Trilium Mall, Circular Road,

Amritsar from 2.00 P.M. to 6.00 P.M. on 2nd and 4th Sunday of every month.

1 of 2
20-05-2018 14:23:13 :::
FAO-5341-2016 -2-

It will be open to the parties to change the place, time and date of meeting

with the mutual consent for convenience of the parties and the child. The

arrangement would continue till Arpandeep Kaur attains majority.

On the basis of the agreement arrived at between the parties, as

mentioned above, the parties would implement the order with effect from

27.05.2018 which is the 4th Sunday of this month.

In case of non-compliance of the terms of the settlement, it will

be open to any of the parties to file an application under Section 43 of the

Guardians and Wards Act for regulating the conduct of the parties and

enforce the rights accruing from the aforesaid agreement.

(M.M.S. BEDI)
JUDGE

(HARI PAL VERMA)
JUDGE
15.05.2018
sanjeev
Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No

2 of 2
20-05-2018 14:23:14 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh