SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gurnam Singh @ Gama vs State Of Punjab on 11 December, 2019

CRM-M-43730 of 2019 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRM-M-43730 of 2019
Date of Decision: 11.12.2019

Gurnam Singh @ Gama ….Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab ….Respondent

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present: Mr. S.S.Kamboj, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Amitoj Singh Dhaliwal, DAG, Punjab

*******

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of

Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR

No.125 dated 31.07.2019 registered for offences punishable under Sections

377, Section341, Section323, Section148 and Section149 of Indian Penal Code (for short, “SectionIPC”) and 4 of

the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at Police Station

Anaj Mandi, District Patiala.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that the offence under Section

377 IPC was registered against Paras, a juvenile. As per allegations against

the petitioner, he has caused injuries to son of complainant and offences

made out against him are under Sections 341, Section323, Section148 and Section149 IPC.

The petitioner was arrested in this case on 04.08.2019. After

completion of investigation challan against him has already been presented

in Court.

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and

1 of 2
23-12-2019 07:11:08 :::
CRM-M-43730 of 2019 -2-

keeping in view the nature of allegations against the petitioner and that

conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is

allowed. Petitioner-Gurnam Singh @ Gama is ordered to be released on

regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of

concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to

following terms:-

(a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions

mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the

benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand

withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel

his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his

presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the

petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.

(c) He shall not leave the country without the previous

permission of the Court.

December 11, 2019 ( SURINDER GUPTA )
jk JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No

Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
23-12-2019 07:11:09 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation