SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gurpal Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Another on 11 February, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM M-22734 of 2017
Date of Decision: February 11, 2019

Gurpal Singh and another ……Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another …. Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present:- Petitioners in person with
Mr. A.S. Brar, Advocate.

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.

Respondent No.2 in person with
Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (Oral)

Report dated 26.09.2018 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Moga has been received whereby after recording statements of

respondent Gurcharan Kaur and accused/petitioners, namely, Gurpal

Singh and Chamkaur Singh, the Court has shown its satisfaction that

the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of their own free

will, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Moreover, during the course of interaction with the

parties, they have shown their resolve to end the dispute and have

made statements that they have compromised the matter as per

Annexure P-2 and shall abide by the same.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the

fact that the offence for which the accused have been hauled up

1 of 2
17-02-2019 00:34:57 :::
CRM M-22734 of 2017 -2-

are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will

go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of

the parties and in view of the law laid down in ‘Gian Singh Vs.

State of Punjab and another’ 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and

‘Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another’

2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the prayer made in the petition is

allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 172 dated 10.10.2015

registered at Police Station South Moga under Section 354 IPC,

District Moga and all consequences arising out of the said FIR qua the

petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

February 11, 2019 (FATEH DEEP SINGH)
amit rana JUDGE

Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
17-02-2019 00:34:58 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh