SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gurpinder Singh @ Pinda vs State Of Punjab on 8 December, 2017

221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-35089 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : December 08, 2017

Gurpinder Singh @ Pinda …..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ….Respondent

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.

***

LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 138 dated 29.06.2017 under Sections 452/376/511/506

IPC (Sections 376/511 IPC were deleted and Section 354 IPC was added

later) registered at Police Station City, District Tarn Taran.

It is submitted that offences punishable under Sections 376, 511

IPC were deleted and Section 354 IPC was added.

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as

he brought to light friendly relations of the complainant with a co-villager.

The petitioner, it is submitted, has nothing to do with the incident in

question. He is not involved in any other criminal case. Moreover, he has

joined investigation pursuant to interim order dated 20.09.2017 passed by

this Court and he undertakes to face the proceedings. It is, thus, prayed that

this petition be allowed.

1 of 2
15-12-2017 23:50:09 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M-35089 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Amrik

Singh, verifies that the petitioner has joined investigation and he is not

involved in any other criminal case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. Consequently, order dated 20.09.2017

is made absolute.

It is reiterated that none of the observations made herein above

are a reflection on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on the

trial.

(Lisa Gill)
December 08, 2017 Judge
rts
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
15-12-2017 23:50:10 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh