SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Gurshan Singh vs State Of Punjab on 12 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

CRM-M-15669-2021 1

215
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.15669 of 2021
Date of Decision:012.07.2021

GURSHAN SINGH ……Petitioner
Vs
STATE OF PUNJAB …..Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present:Mr. J.S. Bedi, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Sonpreet Brar, Adovcate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Anshul Jain, Adovcate
for the complainant.

****

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral)

The case has been taken up for hearing through video

conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section

438 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.323 dated 17.11.2020

registered under Section 406 IPC, 1860 at Police Station

Division No.5, Ludhiana.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has

joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the

Investigating Officer.

Learned counsel for the complainant however, opposed

1 of 2
::: Downloaded on – 13-07-2021 01:21:26 :::
CRM-M-15669-2021 2

the bail on the ground that the petitioner has pocketed the

amount after withdrawl from different banks being nominee of

his father. It appears that dispute is between son and step

mother in respect of the amount left by Parminderjit Singh after

his death. Evidently the complainant has already resorted to

civil litigations in Court of law which are still subjudice.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI

Sukhpal Singh admitted the aforesaid fact and submitted that

the petitioner is no more required for further investigation of the

case.

In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order

dated 08.04.2021 is made absolute. Petitioner shall keep on

joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he

shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2)

Cr.P.C.

Petition stands disposed of.

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH)
12.07.2021 JUDGE
Amandeep

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
13-07-2021 01:21:26 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation