HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 5952/2018
Hakam S/o Himmat, B/c Mev, R/o Bijalheda, Police Station
Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : None present.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
28/05/2018
1. In “Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal versus Union of India and Anr.
2003 (2) SCC 45, Apex Court has held that lawyers have no right
to go on strike or to give a call for boycott of Courts. Calls given
by Bar Association or Bar Council for such purpose cannot require
the Court to adjourn the matters. In “Krishnakant Tamrakar
Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh” decided by the Apex Court
on 28.3.2018. The Apex Court has held that strike by advocates is
in violation of law laid down by the Apex Court and the same
tantamounts to contempt. The Apex Court has further held that
the office bearers are liable to be removed from the office for
passing resolution for strike. In view of the judgment of Apex
Court in Ex.Captain Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India and
“Krishnakant Tamrakar Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh”,
since the advocates are abstaining from work since 21.5.2018,
this Court deems it proper to pass order on merits.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-5952/2018]
2. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C.
3. F.I.R. No.262/2018 was registered at Police Station Tijara,
District Alwar for offence under Sections 376, 511 I.P.C. Later on
the investigation was conducted and offence punishable under
Section 354 IPC was found.
4. I have perused the record.
5. The prosecutrix is a married lady having a child. There is
delay of two days in lodging of FIR. From the case diary it is
revealed that the prosectrix has not sustained any injury.
6. In view of the same, I am inclined to allow the anticipatory
bail.
7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The
S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Tijara, District Alwar in F.I.R.
No.262/2018, is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he
shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in
the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of
Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-
(I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
to the Court or any police officer, and
(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous
permission of the Court.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Teekam/41
