SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hakeemuddeen & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another on 3 September, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. – 11

Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. – 6197 of 2019

Applicant :- Hakeemuddeen Others

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

Hon’ble Rajeev Singh,J.

Heard, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the impugned charge sheet 21.06.2018 filed in Case Crime No.0888 of 2017, under Sections 498A, Section323, Section506, Section427, Section494 IPC and Section 3/Section4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Risiya, District Bahraich as well as summoning order dated 24.12.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bahraich in Case No.13505 of 2018.

After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to surrender and move bail application, before the court concerned and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law.

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

In view of above, it is provided that if the applicants surrender before the court below within thirty days from today, and apply for bail, their application for bail shall be considered and decided by the courts below in view of the settled law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Amrawati Another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290, as affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).

It is made clear that this order shall not be treated as an implied direction of this Court to grant bail to the applicants and the court concerned shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance to law.

Till the aforesaid period of thirty days, no coercive measures shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

In case, applicants fail to surrender before the Courts below, within the stipulated period of thirty days, they will not get benefit of this order.

With above directions this application stands disposed of.

Order Date :- 3.9.2019

Amit/-

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation