SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hardeep Inder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 5 December, 2017

CRM No.M-31421 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 31421 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: December 5 , 2017.

Hardeep Inder Singh …… PETITIONER (s)
State of Punjab …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.123 dated 10.07.2017 under Sections 406/498A/328/120B

IPC, registered at Police Station City Gurdaspur.

It is submitted that the matter has been amicably resolved between

the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on

17.11.2017. Settlement/agreement dated 17.11.2017 is attached with the

connected file i.e., CRM No.M-27757 of 2017. The parties have decided to file

a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. A Demand draft

bearing No.488966 dated 04.12.2017 for a sum of `1,50,000/- drawn on The

1 of 2
10-12-2017 03:50:57 :::
CRM No.M-31421 of 2017

Hoshiarpur Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., Dasuya in favour of the petitioner’s

wife – Amandeep Kaur has been handed to learned counsel for the complainant

in Court today in terms of the said settlement/agreement, for onward

transmission to her. Photocopy of the said demand draft is taken on record

subject to just exceptions. It is submitted that the petitioner undertakes to abide

by the terms and conditions of the settlement. Therefore, it is prayed that this

petition be allowed.

Learned counsel for the complainant verifies the factum of

settlement between the parties and submits that his client has no objection in

case this petition is allowed, subject to strict adherence to the terms and

conditions of the settlement by the petitioner.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner is

likely to abscond, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case,

specifically the settlement arrived at between the parties, but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits thereof, this petition

is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioner, he be released on bail to the

satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. Petitioner shall join

investigation as and when required by the Investigating Agency and comply with

the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

December 5 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
10-12-2017 03:50:58 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation