SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hare Krishna Barman vs Unknown on 18 June, 2018

89. 18.06.2018
Aloke Court 28 C.R.M. 2536 of 2018
In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 10.05.2018 in connection with
Nandakumar P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017 dated 05.03.2017 under
Sections 498A/302/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.


In the matter of : Hare Krishna Barman

Mr. Rabilal Maitra, Sr. Adv.

Mr. R.L. Maitra
… for the Petitioner

Ms. Faria Hossain
Allowed Ms. Debjani Sahu
… for the State

Report is placed on record wherefrom it appears that

delay in the trial court is due to the fact that copy of the

postmortem report had not been handed over to the defence.

Petitioner is in custody for 443 days and it is submitted that

there is slow progress of trial in the matter.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the

prayer for bail and submits that the bail was rejected earlier.

We have considered the materials on record and we find

that delay in the trial is due to non-supply of copy of

postmortem report to the accused persons and keeping in view

the period of detention suffered by the petitioner and the fact

that delay in the instant case is not attributed to the petitioner

or other accused persons, we are inclined in granting bail to the


Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be

released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees

Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of like amount, one of

whom shall be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur, on condition that

he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing
and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in

any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial

court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty

to cancel his bail without further reference to this Court.

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied

for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary

legal formalities.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation