SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Harendra Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 September, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 82

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 33194 of 2019

Applicant :- Harendra Singh

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 15.11.2017 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5 Agra in Complaint case no.987 of 2017 (Raj Kumar Vs. Harendra Singh), under Sections 406 I.P.C., P.S. Mantola, District- Agra, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.5.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the complaint was filed on the basis of false facts and also on the basis of malice. It is further submitted that from the version of the complaint as well as statement of witnesses, offence under the aforesaid Sections is not made out against the applicant. General allegations have been made in the complaint. The impugned order suffers from illegality and infirmity.

On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that applicant has been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 SectionCr.P.C.. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The Magistrate dealing with complaint at this stage has to see only prima-facie case and it cannot be said that no prima-facie case is made out against the applicant. Hence, the prayer made in the present application is refused.

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant pray for limited protection and requested that a direction may be issued to the court below for expeditious disposal of the bail application of the applicant.

Considering the prayer, it is directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the court below and applies for bail within 30 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

It is made clear that no further time shall be allowed to the applicant for surrender before the court concerned.

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.

Order Date :- 18.9.2019

Krishna

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation