SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hari Gopal Sharma And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 4 September, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.24173 of 2018
Date of decision: 4th September, 2019

Hari Gopal Sharma others
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: Mr. N.K. Vadehra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harbir Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab
for respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Lakshaya, Advocate for respondent No.2.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 14.09.2018 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Bathinda has been received whereby after recording statements of

complainant Monika Sharma and the accused persons namely Hari Gopal

Sharma, Shobha Sharma and Rishi Sharma, the Court has shown its

satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of

free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or

pressure.

Learned counsel for the complainant/respondent No.2 as well

as learned counsel for the accused/petitioners have made statement that as

per instructions received, the parties had given final effect to their

agreement settlement/compromise (Annexure P2) and that nothing is due

1 of 2
03-10-2019 04:12:34 :::
CRM-M No.24173 of 2018 2

towards anyone on account of this settlement and that the final effect be

given to this petition.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offenses for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.17 dated 06.04.2017 under Sections 498A, Section406, Section34 IPC

pertaining to Police Station Women Cell, Bathinda and all consequences

arising out of the said FIR qua the petitioners are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
September 4, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
03-10-2019 04:12:35 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation