SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Harinder Singh Alias Hinda vs State Of Punjab on 15 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

In virtual Court

CRM-M-2391-2020 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-2391-2020 (OM)
Date of decision: 15.07.2021

Harinder Singh @ Hinda
… Petitioner

Vs.

State of Punjab
… Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present: Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, DAG, Punjab.

*******
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (ORAL)

CRM-18459-2021

Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner submits that since

Section 406 IPC was added later on, therefore, he has filed the amended

petition.

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and

amended petition is taken on record.

CRM stands disposed of.

CRM-M-2391-2020

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR

No.201 dated 15.11.2016 under Section 420 IPC read with Section 120-B IPC

1 of 2
16-07-2021 02:58:07 :::
In virtual Court

CRM-M-2391-2020 -2-

and Section 406 IPC (added later on), registered at Police Station Phse-I,

District SAS Nagar (Mohali).

While granting interim bail to the petitioner, following order was

passed by this Court on 20.01.2020: –

“The learned counsel contends that all the other co-accused

named in the FIR namely Sohan Singh, Mohan Singh and

Gurwinder Singh @ Gainda have been granted anticipatory bail

by the Court of Sessions and that although the petitioner was not

named in the FIR but subsequently came to be nominated as an

accused on the basis of some report by SIT…”

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Section 406 IPC

was added later on. It is further submitted that in pursuance of the aforesaid

order, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for any

further investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Harwinder Singh,

has not disputed the factual position and states that the petitioner is no more

required for any further investigation.

In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail

granted to the petitioner vide order dated 20.01.2020 is made absolute subject to

the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ]
15.07.2021 JUDGE
vishnu

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether Reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
16-07-2021 02:58:07 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation