SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hariom vs State Of U.P. on 18 October, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 42912 of 2019

Applicant :- Hariom

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Rai

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.

Urge made on behalf of the applicant has been confined to the extent that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. General and vague allegations have been made against the applicant. No specific role has been attributed to the applicant. He happens to be brother-in-law ‘(devar)’ of the deceased and merely on account of his relationship with the husband of the deceased, he has been roped-in, in this case. He has no concern with the so called demand of dowry and he is not the beneficiary of the same. The applicant never raised any demand for dowry. There is no motive to commit the offence. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 15.7.2019.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed prayer for bail.

Without entering into merit of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant – Hariom involved in Case Crime No. 233 of 2019, under Sections – 498A, 304B SectionI.P.C. 3/4 SectionDowry Prohibition Act, Police Station – Chaurichaura, District – Gorakhpur be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Order Date :- 18.10.2019

S Rawat

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation