SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Harwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 6 November, 2017

CRM No.M-32257 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 32257 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: November 6 , 2017.

Harwinder Singh …… PETITIONER (s)
State of Punjab …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Avtar Singh Bhatti, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Arshdeep Singh Brar, Advocate
for the complainant.


The petitioner prays for bail pending trial in FIR No.76 dated

17.06.2017 under Sections 307/498A/406/323/34 IPC registered at Police

Station Sadar Faridkot, District Faridkot.

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the

abovesaid FIR, which was registered due to temperamental differences of the

complainant with the petitioner and his family. The petitioner, it is submitted,

filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on 16.05.2017

i.e., before the registration of the abovesaid FIR, as the complainant had left the

matrimonial home in December, 2016. Challan in this case, it is submitted,

already stands presented. The petitioner is not involved in any other criminal

1 of 2
10-11-2017 23:16:12 :::
CRM No.M-32257 of 2017

case. Therefore, it is prayed that this petition be allowed.

Learned counsel for the complainant opposes this petition.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Kulwinder

Singh, verifies that the final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has since been

presented. The petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other criminal

case. Trial in this case is not likely to conclude in the near future. No useful

purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner incarcerated any longer in the

peculiar facts and circumstances of this case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner is

likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true

facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition filed by Harwinder Singh is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on

bail pending trial subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety to the

satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

It is clarified that none of the observations made hereinabove shall

be construed to be a reflection on the merits of the case. The same are solely

confined for the purpose of decision of the present petition.

November 6 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
10-11-2017 23:16:13 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh