SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hayat Alam S/O Aijaz Ahmed And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 17 January, 2020

Rane 1/3 ABA-133-2020 (SR.910)
17th January, 2020.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2020

1. Hayat Alam S/o. Aijaz Ahmed
2. Nagam Hayat Alam ….Applicants
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent

****
Mr. Ram Mani Upadhyay, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

Friday, 17th January, 2020.

P.C. :

1. Heard.

2. Applicants are the permanent residents
of Mumbai, Maharashtra. They are seeking pre-
arrest bail in Crime No. 700/2019 registered with
Kotwali Police Station, District-Fatehpur, Uttar
Pradesh for the offences punishable under

::: Uploaded on – 17/01/2020 18/01/2020 06:23:28 :::
Rane 2/3 ABA-133-2020 (SR.910)
17th January, 2020.

Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 342, 313, 494 and 377
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 alongwith Sections
3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act read with
Section 4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on
Marriage) Act, 2019. The applicants are seeking
anticipatory bail for a period of three weeks. The
subject offence has been registered by the wife of
applicant no.1 in the State of Uttar Pradesh.
Applicants are seeking reasonable time to
approach the Court of competent jurisdiction to
seek the relief of pre-arrest bail.

3. Since the applicants are residents of
Mumbai, Maharashtra they are hereby granted pre-
arrest bail for a period of four weeks i.e.upto
14th February, 2020 to enable them to approach the
court of competent jurisdiction.

4. It is made expressly clear that this
Court has not gone into the merits of the matter.

5. In view of the facts of the case, in the
event of arrest of the applicants in C.R. No.700 of
2019 registered with of Kotwali Police Station,

::: Uploaded on – 17/01/2020 18/01/2020 06:23:28 :::
Rane 3/3 ABA-133-2020 (SR.910)
17th January, 2020.

District-Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh, they shall be
released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of
Rs.20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand only) each with
one or two sureties in the like sum.

6. The applicants shall not tamper with the
evidence or attempt to influence or contact the
complainant, witnesses or any person concerned
with the case.

7. The Anticipatory Bail Application stands
disposed off.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)

::: Uploaded on – 17/01/2020 18/01/2020 06:23:28 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation