SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Hushen Amadbhai Desrani vs State Of Gujarat on 14 August, 2019

R/CR.MA/15635/2019 ORDER




MR PREMAL S RACHH(3297) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1


Date : 14/08/2019


1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on
behalf of the respondent State.

2. The present application is filed under
Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R.No.I­42 of 2019
registered with Panch ‘B’ Division Police
Station, Jamnagar for offence under Sections
498A, Section306, Section323, Section504, Section506(2) and Section114 of IPC
and under Section 3 and Section4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the
applicant submits that considering the nature
of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged
on regular bail by imposing suitable

Page 1 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:55:37 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/15635/2019 ORDER

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the

respondent­State has opposed grant of regular
bail looking to the nature and gravity of the

5. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties do not press for further
reasoned order.

6. Having heard the learned advocates for the
parties and perusing the material placed on
record and taking into consideration the
facts of the case, nature of allegations,
gravity of offences, role attributed to the
accused, without discussing the evidence in
detail, this Court is of the opinion that
this is a fit case to exercise the discretion
and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

7. This Court has considered the following

(a) applicant is in jail since 17.07.2019.

(b) applicant is father­in­law of the

(c) It is submitted that other co­accused
have been enlarged on regular bail. Copies of
the said orders are placed on record.

(d) I have considered the role attributed to
the applicant.

Looking to the overall facts and
circumstances of the present case, I am
inclined to consider the case of the

Page 2 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:55:37 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/15635/2019 ORDER


8. This Court has also taken into consideration
the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court
in the case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central
Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012] 1
SCC 40.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed.

The applicant is ordered to be released on
regular bail in connection with FIR being
C.R.No.I­42 of 2019 registered with Panch ‘B’
Division Police Station, Jamnagar on
executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/­
(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of
the like amount to the satisfaction of the
trial Court and subject to the conditions
that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or
misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the
interest of the prosecution;
[c] surrender passport, if any, to the
lower court within a week;

[d] not leave India without prior
permission of the Sessions Judge

[e] mark presence before the concerned
Police Station between 1st to 10th day
of every English calendar month for a

Page 3 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:55:37 IST 2019
R/CR.MA/15635/2019 ORDER

period of six months between 11:00
a.m. and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of
residence to the Investigating
Officer and also to the Court at the
time of execution of the bond and
shall not change the residence
without prior permission of this

10. The authorities will release the applicant
only if he is not required in connection with
any other offence for the time being. If
breach of any of the above conditions is
committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will
be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter. Bail bond to be
executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open
for the concerned Court to delete, modify
and/or relax any of the above conditions, in
accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be
influenced by the prima facie observations
made by this Court in the present order.

11. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid
extent. Direct service is permitted.


Page 4 of 4

Downloaded on : Wed Aug 14 22:55:37 IST 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation