SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ibrahim Mohammed Iliyas Noorgat vs State Of Gujarat on 19 March, 2019

R/CR.MA/3614/2019 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 3614 of 2019

IBRAHIM MOHAMMED ILIYAS NOORGAT
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT

Appearance:
MR CHETAN K PANDYA(1973) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. RADHESH Y VYAS(7060) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR LB DABHI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the
Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 19/03/2019
ORAL ORDER

1. The present application is filed under Section
439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for
regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.
No.I­59 of 2018 registered with Mandvi Police
Station, District Surat, for offence under
Sections 498A, 377, 323 and 114 of the Indian
Penal Code and
Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act.

2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
applicant submits that considering the nature of
the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on
regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the
respondent­State has opposed grant of regular
bail looking to the nature and gravity of the
offence.

4. Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties do not press for further

Page 1 of 4
R/CR.MA/3614/2019 ORDER

reasoned order.
5. Having heard the learned advocates for the
parties and perusing the material placed on

record and taking into consideration the facts
of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of
offences, role attributed to the accused,
without discussing the evidence in detail, this
Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case
to exercise the discretion and enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.

6. This Court has also considered the following
aspects:

(a) the applicant is in Jail since 29.01.2019;

(b) investigation is concluded and charge­sheet
is filed; and

(c) looking to the allegations levelled against
the applicant and in view of the material
reflected from the investigation papers, this
Court is inclined to exercise discretion in
favour of the applicant.

7. This Court has also taken into consideration the
law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the
case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation, reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The
applicant is ordered to be released on regular
bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.I­59
of 2018 registered with Mandvi Police Station,
District Surat on executing a personal bond of
Rs.10,000/­ (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of

Page 2 of 4
R/CR.MA/3614/2019 ORDER

the trial Court and subject to the conditions
that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or
misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the
interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower
court within a week;

[d] not leave India without prior permission
of the concerned Trial Court;

[e] mark presence before the concerned
Police Station between 1st to 10th day of
every English calendar month for a
period of six months between 11:00 a.m.
and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of residence
to the Investigating Officer and also to
the Court at the time of execution of
the bond and shall not change the
residence without prior permission of
this Court;

9. The authorities will release the applicant only
if he is not required in connection with any
other offence for the time being. If breach of
any of the above conditions is committed, the
Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue
warrant or take appropriate action in the
matter. Bail bond to be executed before the
lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case.
It will be open for the concerned Court to
delete, modify and/or relax any of the above

Page 3 of 4
R/CR.MA/3614/2019 ORDER

conditions, in accordance with law.

10. At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be
influenced by the prima facie observations made
by this Court in the present order.

11. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
piyush

Page 4 of 4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh