SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ilambhai Bhikhabhai Damor vs State Of Gujarat on 10 October, 2018

R/CR.MA/17703/2018 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17703 of 2018

ILAMBHAI BHIKHABHAI DAMOR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT

Appearance:
MR JAPAN V DAVE(5947) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
MR.K.P.RAVAL, APP, (2) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE

Date : 10/10/2018
ORAL ORDER

1. This application is filed by the applicant under Section
439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in
connection with FIR registered as C.R. No.I-73 of 2018
with Dahod Rural Police Station for the offence punishable
under
Sections 498A, 306 and and 114 of the Indian Penal
Code.

2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicant
may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable
conditions.

3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public
Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State has opposed
grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the
offence.

4. Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties do not press for a further reasoned order.

Page 1 of 4

R/CR.MA/17703/2018 ORDER

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf
of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following
aspects are considered :-

I) The applicant is in custody since 06.06.2018.

II) The investigation is concluded and charge-sheet is
filled.

III) The submission of learned advocate for the applicant
that the applicant is a husband and the marriage span is
of four years.

IV) Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that
registration of FIR also appears to be unnatural,
particularly considering the allegations that on the day
when the applicant had taken his wife from her maternal
residence at that time, he had heard abuses and yet the
complainant had permitted her to go with the applicant.

V) The Court had perused the Postmortem report
however, no sign of any injuries to suggest physical
assault.

VI)Learned Additional Public Prosecutor under the
instructions of the Investigating Officer is unable to bring
on record any special circumstances against the
applicant.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down
by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of
Sanjay
Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

Page 2 of 4
R/CR.MA/17703/2018 ORDER

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and
considering the nature of the allegations made against the
applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion
that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.

7. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant
is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with
C.R. No.I-73 of 2018 registered with Dahod Rural Police Station
on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that
he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower Court within a
week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior
permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station on
alternate Monday of every English calendar month for a
period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the
Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of

Page 3 of 4
R/CR.MA/17703/2018 ORDER

execution of the bond and shall not change the residence
without prior permission of this Court;

8. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
required in connection with any other offence for the time
being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed,
the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or
take appropriate action in the matter.

9. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned
Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
conditions, in accordance with law.

10. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this
stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

11. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is
permitted.

(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
Siddharth

Page 4 of 4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh