SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

In Re:- Tinku Roy vs Re: An Application For Bail Under … on 30 March, 2017


51 30.3.2017

C.R.M. No.2591 of 2017

In re:- Tinku Roy …. Petitioner.


Re: An application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. affirmed on 24.3.2017 in connection with S.T.
No.01(09)14/S.C. No.21(07)14 arising out of Mahestala Police Station Case No.210/2014 dated 20.3.2014
under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and adding section 302 I.P.C.

Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty,
Mr. S. S. Saha … For the petitioner.

Mr. Arun Kumar Maity, A.P.P.,
Mrs. Faria Hossain …. For the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties.

Perused the case diary.

The petitioner is the brother-in-law of the victim house, who is in

custody for 1100 days.

It is true that trial has commenced and three witnesses have

been examined.

Considering the materials against the petitioner as available

from the case diary and his length of detention in custody and the fact

that when no case is made out from the side of the State showing that

further custodial detention of the petitioner is necessary, we allow his

prayer for bail.

Let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of Rs.5,000/- each, one of whom must be

local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, South 24-

Parganas at Alipore.


It is further directed that after being released on bail, the

petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date of trial so

fixed by such court.

We make it clear that if the petitioner fails to comply with the

aforesaid direction on any occasion without any sufficient reason, the trial

court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail granted to the

petitioner and take him into custody without any further reference to this


The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Ashim Kumar Roy, J.)

(Malay Marut Banerjee, J. )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation