1 51 30.3.2017
C.R.M. No.2591 of 2017
In re:- Tinku Roy …. Petitioner.
Re: An application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. affirmed on 24.3.2017 in connection with S.T.
No.01(09)14/S.C. No.21(07)14 arising out of Mahestala Police Station Case No.210/2014 dated 20.3.2014
under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and adding section 302 I.P.C.
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty,
Mr. S. S. Saha … For the petitioner.
Mr. Arun Kumar Maity, A.P.P.,
Mrs. Faria Hossain …. For the State.
Heard the learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the parties.
Perused the case diary.
The petitioner is the brother-in-law of the victim house, who is in
custody for 1100 days.
It is true that trial has commenced and three witnesses have
Considering the materials against the petitioner as available
from the case diary and his length of detention in custody and the fact
that when no case is made out from the side of the State showing that
further custodial detention of the petitioner is necessary, we allow his
prayer for bail.
Let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of
Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of Rs.5,000/- each, one of whom must be
local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, South 24-
Parganas at Alipore.
It is further directed that after being released on bail, the
petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date of trial so
fixed by such court.
We make it clear that if the petitioner fails to comply with the
aforesaid direction on any occasion without any sufficient reason, the trial
court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail granted to the
petitioner and take him into custody without any further reference to this
The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Ashim Kumar Roy, J.)
(Malay Marut Banerjee, J. )