SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

In The High Court Of Himachal … vs State Of H.P. on 22 November, 2018

Cr.MP(M) No. 1522 of 2018
Decided on : 22.11.2018


Hasham Deen     …..Petitioner. 

State of H.P.              ….Respondent. 

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?  

For the petitioner:

r to Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate. 

For the respondent: Mr. Hemant Vaid, Addl. A.G. 
with Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G., for
the respondent.  

Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral)

The instant petition, has been   filed by applicant/

accused,   under   Section   439,   Code   of   Criminal   Procedure,   for

seeking, an order, for his being released from judicial custody,

whereat he is extantly lodged, for, his allegedly committing an

offence, punishable under Sections 363, 366 and Section 376,

of the Indian Penal Code, in respect whereof, an FIR No. 258 of

2018,   of,   30.9.2018,   is,   registered   with   Police   Station,   Sadar

Chamba, District Chamba, H.P.  

24/11/2018 22:57:27 :::HCHP


2. The prosecutrix is aged 28 years, and, she chose to


join the company of the bail­applicant, on 29.9.2018, at 5.30

P.M. at Thundu, and, therefrom, she accompanied him upto a

secluded   place,   where   she   stayed   overnight   with   him.     The

alleged forcible sexual intercourse inter­se both also occurred

at the afore secluded place.  However, enroute the afore place of

incident, she changed her clothes at her friends house (i) and

thereat,   she   omitted   to   make   any   disclosure   qua   the   bail

applicant, forcing her to join his company.   The further effect

thereof   is   that   the   prosecutrix   is   to   be   concluded   to

consensually,   join   the   company   of   the   bail­applicant,   (ii)

nonetheless, the factum of the prosecutrix consensually joining

the   company   of   the   bail   applicant,   would   not   also   hold   the

effect   of   the   apt   statement,   wherein,   she   ascribes   an

incriminatory   role,   vis­a­vis,   the   bail   applicant,   rather   being

falsified, (iii) nor   her ascription qua the bail applicant, upon,

his administering drugs to her, hence, his holding her to coitus,

comes   to   be   falsified,   However,   want   of   concurrent   therewith

disclosures,   in   the   MLC   concerned,   thereupon,   the   afore

ascription   in   the,   statement,   recorded   under   Section   161

Cr.P.C.   is per­se is not believable (iv) hence when she fails to

24/11/2018 22:57:27 :::HCHP

communicate   qua   upon   hers’   being   administered   drugs,   her


falling  unconscious, and, in the spell of her unconsciousness’

hence  the alleged act occuring.      

3. Bearing   in   mind   the   aforesaid   factum,   this   Court

deems   it   fit   and   appropriate,   importantly,   when   the

Investigating Officer, has reported that the bail petitioner, has

throughout associated, hence, in the relevant investigation, to,

hence   afford,   the   facility   of   bail   in   favour,   of,   the   bail

applicant/petitioner.  Moreso,   when  at   this   stage,  no   evidence

has been adduced by the prosecution, demonstrating, that in

the event of bail being granted to the bail applicant/petitioner,

there   being   every   likelihood   of   his   fleeing   from   justice   or

tampering   with   prosecution   evidence,   accordingly,   constrains

this   Court   to   grant   the   indulgence   of   bail,   to   the   bail

applicant/petitioner, on, the following conditions:­

I) That he shall furnish personal bond, comprised in a 
sum of Rs. 1,00,000/­ with one surety in the like  
amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial  
Magistrate Chamba.

ii) That   he   shall   join   the   investigation,   as   and   when
required by the Investigating agency;

24/11/2018 22:57:27 :::HCHP


iii) That   he   shall   not   directly   or   indirectly   make   any


inducement,   threat   or   promise   to   any   person

acquainted   with   the   facts   of   the   case   so   as   to
dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court

or to the Police;

iv) That   he   shall  not  leave  India  without   the  previous

permission of the Court;

v) That he shall deposit his passport, if any, with the

Police Station, concerned;

vi) That in case of violation of any of the conditions, the
bail granted to the petitioner shall be forfeited and

he shall be liable to be taken into custody;

4. In   view   of   above,   petition   stand   disposed   of.   Any

observation   made   herein   above   shall   not   be   taken   as   an

expression  of  opinion  on  the  merits   of  the  case  and  the  trial

Court shall decide the matter uninfluenced by any observation

made herein above. 

Dasti Copy. 

22nd November, 2018                (Sureshwar Thakur),
           (kck)                    Judge

24/11/2018 22:57:27 :::HCHP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation