CRM-M No.15690 of 2018 (OM) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM-M No.15690 of 2018 (OM)
Date of Decision: 24.01.2019
Inderjit Singh ….Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ….Respondent
BEFORE :- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:- Mr. H.S. Brar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Mehta, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate
for the complainant.
*****
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
CRM No.1798 of 2019
This application has been moved for correction of
section/offence mentioned in the headnote as well as in the prayer clause as
it has been mentioned as 406 IPC instead of 420 IPC.
Notice in the application.
On asking of the Court, Mr. Amit Mehta, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab,
who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.
Notice on behalf of complainant has been accepted by
Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate.
For the reasons recorded in the application and having no
objection from other side, the same is allowed. Offence under Section
406 IPC be now read as 420 IPC in the headnote as well as in the prayer
1 of 2
11-02-2019 06:37:05 :::
CRM-M No.15690 of 2018 (OM) 2
clause.
CRM-M No.15690 of 2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has joined the investigation and this fact has been affirmed by learned State
counsel.
However, learned counsel for the complainant has opposed
grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the ground that agreement to
sell has been admitted by the petitioner and u-turn has been taken by him
subsequently. Admittedly, the challan qua co-accused has been filed. The
petitioner was away to abroad and was declared as a proclaimed offender.
Said P.O order has already been set aside vide order dated 30.01.2018
passed in CRM-M No.2166 of 2017. Petitioner has joined the investigation
and moreover, the civil remedies have been taken by all the parties. The
evidence is a matter of trial.
In view of the above, the interim order dated 10.05.2018 passed
in favour of the petitioner is made absolute.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
However, it is directed that in case, the petitioner intends to go
abroad, the prior permission be obtained from the trial Court.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY)
24.01.2019 JUDGE
gurpreet
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
11-02-2019 06:37:05 :::