SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Indra @ Indu @ Indrani vs State on 17 February, 2020

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1462/2020

Indra @ Indu @ Indrani W/o Sh. Kuldeep Jat, Aged About 60
Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Sherpura Khedi Chopta, Sirsa Presently
Residing At 241, Sector No. 15A, Hisar, Tehsil And District
Hisar, Haryana.

State, Through P.p.


For Petitioner(s) : Dr. RDSS Kharlia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
Mr. Kuldeep Sharma for the




This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the

petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.

No.453/2019, Police Station Sangaria, District Hanumangarh for

the offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

is mother-in-law of the complainant and except the omnibus

allegations, there is nothing on record to show or suggest that the

allegations against the present petitioner are true. He further

submits that the co-accused Kuldeep Godara, father-in-law, has

already been enlarged on anticipatory bail. He, therefore, prays

that the present petitioner may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

(Downloaded on 17/02/2020 at 08:50:38 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1462/2020]

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of

the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed

that in the event of arrest of petitioner Indra @ Indu @ Indrani

W/o Sh. Kuldeep Jat, in connection with F.I.R. No.453/2019, Police

Station Sangaria, District Hanumangarh, the petitioner shall be

released on bail; provided she furnishes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) along with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only)

each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating

Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

(I) that the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.



(Downloaded on 17/02/2020 at 08:50:38 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation