SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Islam @ Pappu vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 8 August, 2019

264.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-34871-2018
Date of decision: 08.08.2019

ISLAM @ PAPPU … Petitioner

versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS …. Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
—-

Present: None.
—-

HARI PAL VERMA, J.(Oral)

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is

to take appropriate legal action against the accused persons in FIR No.122

dated 26.06.2018 under Sections 323, Section328, Section34, Section498A of IPC registered at

Police Station Pinangwa, District Nuh.

It is the primary grievance of the petitioner that after the

registration of FIR, police is not taking any action against the accused

persons on the basis of this FIR. As per the FIR, petitioner’s daughter Fatima

was married with Naseem son of Hasan about one year back. However, after

marriage, Naseem (husband), Hasan (father-in-law), Siara (mother-in-law),

Ruma (son of Hasan), Sehnaz (wife of Khalid) and Khalid (son of Hasan

Mohammad) started beating his daughter for not bringing car in the dowry,

and they have thrown her out of the matrimonial home many times.

Thereafter, panchayat was convened. On 25.06.2018 in the morning, an

information was received that his daughter was given beatings and has been

administered poison. Thereafter, she was admitted in Himat Rai Hospital,

1 of 2
31-08-2019 22:45:08 :::
CRM-M-34871-2018 -2-

Pinangwa. When the complainant reached hospital, he was not allowed to

meet his daughter. In this manner, FIR was registered.

The status of the aforesaid FIR has been downloaded from the

official website of the Sessions Court Mewat. A perusal of the judgment

dated 05.03.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court,

Mewat shows that the charges in the case were framed against the accused

for the offences under Sections 323, Section328, Section498-A, Section304-B and Section216 read with

Section 34 of IPC on 29.01.2019. The petitioner, who is father of the

deceased-Fatima, appeared as PW1, but he did not support the case of the

prosecution. He had deposed that there was no demand of dowry from the

in-laws of his daughter and her relationship with them was very cordial. He

has solemnized simple marriage of his daughter, but his daughter suffered

from mental problem right from her birth and was in a state of acute

depression and illness. It is because of her illness, she consumed poison on

25.06.2018. The accused did not contribute to her death in any manner.

Accordingly, vide judgment dated 05.03.2019, the trial Court,

after appreciating the evidence on record, acquitted the accused of the

charges levelled against them.

In view of above, when the accused in the present FIR have

already been acquitted by the trial Court, the present petition is rendered

infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of.

(HARI PAL VERMA)
JUDGE
08.08.2019
sanjeev
Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No

2 of 2
31-08-2019 22:45:09 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation