CRM-M-27414-2015 (OM) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-27414-2015 (OM)
Date of Decision:-28.05.2018.
Jagdish Singh and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
……Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
****
Present: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Senior DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
****
P.B. BAJANTHRI, J. (Oral)
In the instant petition, petitioners have sought for quashing of
FIR No.122 dated 31.05.2014 (Annexure P-1) under Section 406 IPC,
registered at Police Station Sultanwind, District Amritsar and all subsequent
proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 21.02.2015
(Annexure P-2).
2.) There was a dispute among the petitioners and the private
respondents arising out of marriage proposal i.e., after ring ceremony was
over. Consequently, FIR has been filed. During pendency of the FIR
No.122 dated 31.05.2014, parties have entered into compromise on
21.02.2015 (Annexure P-2). Proceeding in the case not commenced so far
i.e. challan not filed by the police so far. In terms of the compromise,
1 of 2
11-06-2018 01:11:11 :::
CRM-M-27414-2015 (OM) -2-
petitioners have handed over a cheque for a sum of ` 5,00,000/- towards full
and final settlement. Both the parties are present in the Court and they have
no objection to dispose the case in view of compromise. Cheque is in the
name of Smt. Preetam Kaur-respondent No.2.
3.) Learned counsel for the State has no objection in quashing the
FIR on the basis of compromise.
4.) In view of these developments, FIR No.122 dated 31.05.2014
(Annexure P-1) under Section 406 IPC, registered at Police Station
Sultanwind, District Amritsar and all subsequent proceedings therefrom are
quashed subject to payment of cost of ` 2,000/- by each of the petitioner to
the State of Punjab. Cost shall be remitted in the Home Department, State
of Punjab within 1 month from today. If the cheque is not realized in that
event, complainant is permitted to make necessary application for revival of
this order.
5.) With the above observations, petition stands allowed.
(P.B. BAJANTHRI)
JUDGE
May 28, 2018.
sandeep
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes / No
Whether Reportable:- Yes / No.
2 of 2
11-06-2018 01:11:11 :::