233
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-M-99 of 2016.
Decided on:-May 07, 2018.
Jagjit Singh.
………Appellant.
Versus
Sharandeep Kaur.
………Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
*****
Present:- None for the appellant.
Mr. Harbhajan Singh, Advocate
for the respondent.
M.M.S. BEDI, J.(Oral)
Neither any one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant
nor the arrears of maintenance pendente lite have been paid. Case has been
called twice, but no one has appeared on behalf of appellant Jagjit Singh.
Counsel for the respondent claims that the arrears of
maintenance pendete lite, if calculated, would come to Rs.1,00,000/- upto
April, 2018.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
1 of 2
19-05-2018 23:48:54 :::
FAO-M-99-2016 -2-
In case the appellant seeks restoration of the appeal for
consideration on merits, the application should be accompanied by a bank
draft in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in the name of the respondent.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
JUDGE
(HARI PAL VERMA)
May 07, 2018 JUDGE
Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes
Whether Reportable: No
2 of 2
19-05-2018 23:48:55 :::
