SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Jagjit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 24 March, 2017

CRM No.M-21873 of 2016                                                       [1]


                                    Criminal Misc. No.M- 21873 of 2016(OM)
                                               Date of Decision: March 24 , 2017.

Jagjit Singh                ...... PETITIONER (s)


State of Punjab             ...... RESPONDENT (s)


Present:       Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate
               for the petitioner.

               Ms. Shivali, AAG, Punjab.

               Mr. J.S.Khattar, Advocate
               for the complainant.
               1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
                  the judgment?
               2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
               3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.48 dated 02.06.2016 under Sections 406/498A/506 IPC

registered at Police Station Kathu Nangal, District Amritsar.

This matter was placed before the Mediation and Conciliation

Centre of this Court to explore the possibility of an amicable resolution of the

dispute. The parties have resolved the matter between them. The terms and

conditions of the settlement have been reduced into writing on 17.02.2017.

The parties have decided to part ways. The settlement/agreement dated

1 of 2
::: Downloaded on – 26-03-2017 16:29:09 :::
CRM No.M-21873 of 2016 [2]

17.02.2017 is attached with this file.

Learned counsel for the complainant affirms the factum of

settlement between the parties. It is submitted that in view thereof there is no

objection on behalf of the complainant to the grant of anticipatory bail to the


Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Hardeep

Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and he is not

required for custodial interrogation. No recovery is to be effected from him.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition is allowed. Consequently, order dated 12.07.2016 is made absolute.

                                                        ( LISA GILL )
March 24 , 2017.                                            JUDGE

                    Whether speaking/reasoned:       Yes/No
                    Whether reportable:              Yes/No

                                    2 of 2
                 ::: Downloaded on - 26-03-2017 16:29:10 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation