SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Jagtar Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 21 September, 2018

CRM-M-7527-2018 (OM)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.M-7527 of 2018
Date of decision : 21st September, 2018

Jagtar Singh and others
……Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab and others
…Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present: Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3.
****

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)

The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.0071 dated

10.06.2017 registered under Sections 498A, 420 and 34 of the IPC,

registered at Police Station Sadar Nawanshahar, District S.B.S. Nagar and

the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written

compromise arrived at between the parties.

Report has been received from the trial Court after statements

of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. The trial Court has

reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or

coercion. The trial Court has also sent the statements of parties in original.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that

1 of 2
14-10-2018 01:43:44 :::
CRM-M-7527-2018 (OM)

petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved

person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the

principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder

Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR

(Criminal) 1052, approved by Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State

of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the instant petition is allowed and

the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis

thereof are quashed qua the petitioners.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of

compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY)
JUDGE

21.09.2018
tarun

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
14-10-2018 01:43:44 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh