SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Jasbir Singh Daswal @ Chiraj And … vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 7 September, 2018

277 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-23292-2018 (OM)
Date of decision : 07.09.2018

Jasbir Singh Daswal @ Chiraj and another
……Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and another
…Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. Ripu Daman, A.A.G., Haryana.

None for respondent No.2.

****

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)

The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.15 dated

13.01.2015 registered under Sections 406/498-A/506/323 of IPC (Section

377 IPC and Section 66-A of I.T. Act added later on) at Police Station

Faridabad Kotwli, District Faridabad and the consequent proceedings

arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the

parties.

Report has been received from the trial Court after

statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. The

trial Court has reported that the compromise is Voluntary and without any

pressure, threat, coercion or undue influence. The trial Court has also sent

statements of the parties in original.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that

petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved

person in this FIR.

1 of 2
07-10-2018 12:33:18 :::
CRM-M-23292-2018 (OM) -2-

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the

principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder

Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR

(Criminal) 1052, approved by Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State

of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the instant petition is allowed

and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the

basis thereof are quashed.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms

of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY)
JUDGE

07.09.2018
ps-I

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
07-10-2018 12:33:19 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation