HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 719 / 2017
Jetha Ram S/o Sh. Jamta Ram, by caste Mali, resident of
Sanchore, District Jalore.
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Dinesh Bishnoi.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Ashok Upadhyay, P.P.
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
11/04/2017
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.366/2016, P.S. Balotra, District Barmer, for the offences under
Sections 498A, 323, 406 and 342 I.P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
The petitioner is the father-in-law of the complainant, who
alleged in the F.I.R. that the accused persons threw her down from
the roof of the house. However, from perusal of her injury report,
it is noticed that she was found suffering from one small abrasion
on her wrist. The Investigating Officer has deleted the offence
under Section 342 I.P.C. during investigation. The husband of the
complainant has already been arrested.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-719/2017]
Having regard to the facts and circumstances available on
record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the
Bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioner Jetha Ram in connection
with F.I.R. No.366/2016, P.S. Balotra, District Barmer, the
petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a
personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties
of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned
Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-
(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself/herself/themselves
available for interrogation by a police officer as and when
required;
(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.
/tarun goyal/
Sr.P.A
