TA No. 4 of 2019 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TA No. 4 of 2019 (OM)
Date of decision : 26.8.2019
…
Jyoti Aggarwal
…………….Applicant
vs.
Ajay Aggarwal
……………..Respondent
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. G.S. Bedi, Advocate for the respondent.
…
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
Report by Joint Registrar, (Judicial Co-oord.), seen.
Hon’ble the Chief Justice has already passed orders in that regard. No
further action in the matter is required.
Applicant – Jyoti Aggarwal, aged about 27 years, estranged
wife of Ajay Aggarwal, presently residing with her parents at Village
Balsamand, Tehsil and District Hisar, on account of matrimonial
discord between the spouses, has filed the instant application under
Section 24 CPC, seeking transfer of petition under Section 25 of the
Guardian and SectionWards Act, 1890 for the custody and guardianship of
minor son Yug/Bhavik, filed by her husband, who is respondent in
the present application, against her, having title ‘Ajay Aggarwal vs.
1 of 4
02-09-2019 07:09:00 :::
TA No. 4 of 2019 -2-
Jyoti Aggarwal’ pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior
Division), Chandigarh, to a Court of competent jurisdiction at Hisar.
According to the applicant, the marriage solemnized between
the parties on 14.7.2013, at Hisar, ran into rough weather, though the
couple was blessed with a son, namely, Master Yug/Bhavik on
13.12.2015, who is presently residing with the applicant. The
applicant alongwith minor son of the parties had to leave the
matrimonial home and start residing with her parents at village
Balsamand, Tehsil and District Hisar. The applicant has filed a
petition under Protection of Woman from SectionDomestic Violence Act,
against the respondent and his mother in the Court at Hisar, where the
respondent has appeared and is attending the proceedings. The
respondent has filed the petition in question in the Court at
Chandigarh. The applicant being a young woman, taking care of the
minor son of the parties aged about 3 years, having no source of
income, with no adult male member in her parental family being
available, to accompany her from Hisar to Chandigarh, it is difficult
for her to attend the dates of hearing in Court at Chandigarh, covering
a distance of about 250 kms from her parental place, as such the
application be accepted.
Notice of the application was given to the respondent, who
has appeared through counsel and filed written reply, contesting the
application vehemently, praying for its dismissal.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties, besides going
through the record.
The Apex Court in various judgments has observed that in
2 of 4
02-09-2019 07:09:00 :::
TA No. 4 of 2019 -3-
matrimonial disputes between the spouses convenience of wife
should be looked into. In that regard a reference can be made to
authority Sumita Singh Versus Kumar Sanjay and another, 2002
AIR(SC) 396 by a Division Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court.
In Bhartiben Ravibhai Rav Versus Ravibhai Govindbhai
Rav, 2017(3) RCR(Civil) 369, the Apex Court had allowed
application for transfer of the divorce petition to a place where the
wife was residing considering various factors including the distance
between the place where the wife was residing and the place of sitting
of the Court where divorce petition had been instituted and the fact
that the wife had filed two cases against her husband in the Court at
the place of her residence wherein the respondent had already put in
appearance.
In Apurva Versus Navtej Singh, 2017(2) Law Herald 966
by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, it was observed that wherever
the Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer in
matrimonial disputes, the Courts have to take into consideration
various factors like economic soundness of either of the parties, the
social strata of the spouses to which they belong and behavioural
pattern, standard of life antecedents of marriage. Generally it is the
wife’s convenience, which must be looked at by the Courts while
deciding the transfer application.
Keeping in view the contentions in the application and
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, I find that
ends of justice demand that the application be allowed.
Accordingly, the application is accepted. The petition in
3 of 4
02-09-2019 07:09:00 :::
TA No. 4 of 2019 -4-
question pending in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division),
Chandigarh, is withdrawn from that Court and transferred to the
Family Court, Hisar, for disposal in accordance with law. Parties
through counsel are directed to appear there on 30.9.2019.
A copy of the order be sent to the Courts concerned, for
information and necessary compliance.
( H.S. Madaan )
26.8.2019 Judge
chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No
Whether reportable Yes / No
4 of 4
02-09-2019 07:09:00 :::