SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kalindi Devi vs State Of U.P. on 31 July, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 30686 of 2019

Applicant :- Kalindi Devi

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Prabodh Dubey,Ashok Kumar Giri

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P and perused the material available on record.

While describing various facets of the case, it has been claimed that in this case, the applicant happens to be mother-in-law of the deceased. Neither she raised any demand of dowry at any point of time nor was deceased subjected to cruelty or harassment by her. General and vague allegations have been made against the applicant. Merely because the applicant is mother-in-law of the deceased, she has been roped in falsely in this case by the informant. In case the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant does not bear any criminal history and is languishing in jail since 03.03.2019.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed prayer for bail.

Without entering into merit of the case but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed.

Let the applicant- Kalindi Devi involved in Case Crime No.60 of 2019, under Sections 498A, Section304-B I.P.C. and 3/4 SectionDowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Gagaha, District Gorakhpur be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Order Date :- 31.7.2019

Raj

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation