SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kaluram @ Kalu vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 January, 2020

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 164/2020

Kaluram @ Kalu S/o Lalu, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste
Maeyada Bhill, R/o Nalda, Police Thana Ambupara, Dist.
Banswara. (Accused Lodge At Dist. Jail Banswara).

—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Nayak
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Farzand Ali, AAG cum GA
Mr. Shrawan Bishnoi, PP

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

08/01/2020
The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection

with F.I.R. No.244/2019, P.S. Ambupara, District Banswara for the

offences under Sections 406 IPC and 3/7 EC Act, 1955.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

alleged offence against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. The

charge-sheet in the matter has already been filed. The conclusion

of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that

the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of

(Downloaded on 08/01/2020 at 09:00:02 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-164/2020]

the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner

deserves to be accepted.

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

that the accused-petitioner Kalu Ram @ Kalu S/o Lalu arrested

in connection with F.I.R. No.244/2019, P.S. Ambupara, District

Banswara shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a

personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two

surities of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear

before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called

upon to do so.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

98-praveen/-

(Downloaded on 08/01/2020 at 09:00:02 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation