SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kamal Jain & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 2 May, 2018

CRM No.M-28533 of 2017


Criminal Misc. No. M- 28533 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: May 02 , 2018.

Kamal Jain and another …… PETITIONER(s)


State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Mr. K.S.Aulakh, DAG, Punjab.

None for respondent No.2.


Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.141 dated

06.10.2016 under Section 498A IPC, registered at Police Station Model Town,

Hoshiarpur and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the

basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties.

The abovesaid FIR was registered at the instance of respondent No.2

due to matrimonial discord with her husband i.e., petitioner No.1. It is submitted

that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties before the

National Lok Adalat, Hoshiarpur. The terms of settlement were reduced into

writing on 08.04.2017 (Annexure P2). Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2

decided to part ways.

1 of 4
13-05-2018 03:24:36 :::
CRM No.M-28533 of 2017

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petition under

Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by petitioner No.1 and

respondent No.2 has since been allowed on 10.02.2018. Nothing remains due

towards respondent No.2. It is thus prayed that this petition be allowed.

Certified copy of judgment and decree dated 10.02.2018 passed by

the learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur alongwith statements of the

parties recorded at second motion the said proceedings, furnished in Court today,

are taken on record subject to just exceptions.

This Court on 13.11.2017 directed the parties to appear before

learned trial court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements in respect to

the above-mentioned compromise. Learned trial court/Illaqa Magistrate was

directed to submit a report regarding the genuineness of the compromise, as to

whether it has been arrived at out of the free will and volition of the parties

without any coercion, fear or undue influence. Learned trial court/Illaqa

Magistrate was also directed to intimate whether any of the petitioners are

absconding/proclaimed offenders and whether any other case is pending against

them. Information was sought as to whether all affected persons are a party to

the settlement.

Pursuant to order dated 13.11.2017, the parties appeared before the

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur and their statements were recorded

on 30.11.2017. Respondent No.2 stated that she has amicably resolved the

dispute with the petitioners out of her own free will and consent without any

coercion or pressure from any quarter and has no objection in case the abovesaid

FIR against the accused petitioners is quashed. Statements of the petitioners in

2 of 4
13-05-2018 03:24:37 :::
CRM No.M-28533 of 2017

respect to the settlement were recorded as well. Statement of ASI Rakesh Kumar,

Police Station Model Town, Hoshiarpur was recorded to the effect that the

petitioners are not proclaimed offenders and not involved in any other criminal


As per report dated 22.12.2017 received from the learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur, satisfaction is expressed that the compromise

between the parties is genuine and voluntary, arrived at without any coercion or

undue influence. None of the petitioners are reported to be proclaimed offenders.

Statements of the parties are appended alongwith the said report.

Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, Advocate had appeared on behalf of

respondent No.2 before this Court on 13.11.2017. He had affirmed the factum of

settlement between the parties and raised no objection in case the abovesaid FIR

against the petitioners is quashed, pursuant to which the parties were directed to

appear before the learned Area Magistrate/trial court for recording of their

statements in respect to the settlement.

Learned counsel for the State submits that as the abovesaid FIR

arises out of a matrimonial dispute, the State has no objection to the quashing of

the FIR in question as well as all consequential proceedings on the basis of a

settlement arrived at between the parties.

In Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another

2007 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052, a five member Bench of this Court has

observed as under:-

“The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of
harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the
power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is used to

3 of 4
13-05-2018 03:24:37 :::
CRM No.M-28533 of 2017

enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social
amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.S.Joshi and others v. State of

Haryana, 2003(4) SCC 675 has observed that it becomes the duty of the Court to

encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, it would be

in the interest of justice to quash the abovesaid FIR as no useful purpose would

be served by continuance of the present proceedings. It will merely lead to

wastage of precious time of the court and would be an exercise in futility.

This petition is, thus, allowed and FIR No.141 dated 06.10.2016

under Section 498A IPC, registered at Police Station Model Town, Hoshiarpur

alongwith all consequential proceedings are, hereby, quashed.

May 02 , 2018. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4
13-05-2018 03:24:37 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation