IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.OP No.400 of 2019 and Crl.MP No.243 of 2019
3. Sumathi … Petitioners
State by the Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Tiruppur North …Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr. PC to set
aside the order dated 14.12.2018 made in Crl.MP.No.11060 of 2018 in CC
No.659 of 2017 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruppur and
allow this Criminal Original Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Franklin
For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor
This criminal original petition has been filed challenging the
order passed by the Court below dismissing the petition filed under Section
PW1, PW7 and PW8.
2. The petitioners are facing a trial before the Court below for an
witnesses and the petitioner did not cross-examine PW7 PW8. Thereafter,
the petitioners were questioned under Section 313 of Cr.PC and the case
was posted for defence evidence and since no witnesses were produced, the
defence evidence was closed and the case was at the stage of arguments. At
this stage, the present petition came to be filed before the Court below to
recall and cross-examine PW1, PW7 and PW8.
3.The Court below had dismissed the petition on the ground that PW1
was already cross-examined by the petitioners and there is no reason for
again recalling PW1 for further cross-examination. The Court below also
found that the petitioners ought to have cross-examined PW7 and PW8 on
the same date, they were examined in chief. But this was not done by the
petitioners and therefore, the Court below relying upon the judgement of
the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab proceeded
to dismiss the petition filed by the petitioners.
4. This Court does not find any illegality or infirmity in the order
passed by the Court below. However, it is seen from the records that the
petitioners have participated in the proceedings which commenced in the
year 2017 and have cross examined most of the witnesses. The petitioners
want to further cross-examine PW1 on the ground that certain important
documents needs to be marked through PW1 and PW1 has to be questioned
on those documents. PW7 is the police officer who registered the FIR and
PW8 is the Investigating Officer.
5. This Court is of the considered view that one last opportunity
can be given to the petitioners to cross-examine PW1, PW7 and PW8 by
imposing certain conditions.
6. The order passed by the Court below in C.M.P.No.11060 of 2018
dated 14.12.2018 is hereby set aside. The Court below shall fix a date for
cross-examination of PW1, PW7 and PW8. On the day, when these witnesses
appear, they shall be cross-examine by the petitioners on the very same
date. If for any reason, the petitioners fails to cross-examine them, the
petitioners shall forfeit their right to recall these witnesses for cross-
examination in future. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- to PW1,
Rs.1,000/- each to PW7 and PW8, when these witnesses appear before the
Court for cross-examination. The Criminal Original Petition is accordingly
allowed and the Court below is directed to complete the proceedings in CC
No.659 of 2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tiruppur,
within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this
order. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Speaking / Non Speaking Order
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1,
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras.
N. ANAND VENKATESH , J.
Crl.OP No.400 of 2019